Do You Need Help With Your Disability Claim?

Social Security Disability Attorneys and Advocates can help you in all phases of the social security disability claim process. Contact an advocate today for your FREE case evaluation!

Posts Tagged ‘unemployment’

Concerns about SSA funding continue–especially for SSDI benefits

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

SSDI benefits exempt from many creditors, but funding hammered by high, chronic unemployment

m

We’ve addressed this before, but with the debt-ceiling debate, US credit downgrade and endless political posturing, it’s probably a good time to once again discuss the financial health of Social Security overall and the SSDI and SSI programs in particular.

Experts warn of shortfalls in retirement and disability benefits

As we’ve written before, Social Security itself has been declared to be OK until about 2036; in other words, if nothing changes between now and then, the fund will be able to pay out only about 75 per cent of scheduled payments. Medicare is in slightly worse shape, but SSDI (Social Security Disability Insurance) will be busted sometime between 2015 to 2018.

SSDI could run dry as early as 2015

According to long Wall Street Journal piece on SSDI payments increasing in Puerto Rico (but also instructive for its good info on the SSDI national status), “The SSDI is set to soon become the first big federal benefit program to run out of cash—and one of the main reasons is U.S. states and territories have a large say in who qualifies for the federally funded program. Without changes, the Social Security retirement fund can survive intact through about 2040 and Medicare through 2029. The disability fund, however, will run dry in four to seven years without federal intervention, government auditors say.”

Applications have risen along with increased unemployment

According to an Aug. 22 account at Politico.com:

The Social Security disability fund is fast running out of money and may not be able to make payments starting in 2017, thanks in part to the bad economy driving claims up over the past decade, The Associated Press reported.

Applications for benefit claims have risen almost 50 percent in the past 10 years, as many people with disabilities are laid off and cannot find new jobs in the difficult job market. And, the AP added, the rush for benefits is causing a major backup for applicants currently waiting to get their cases decided.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the disability trust fund will be exhausted by 2017 unless Congress acts. If the fund’s balance falls to zero, it cannot pay out full benefits unless the law is altered. And it’s not the only benefit fund that’s nearly insolvent: In 2040, the CBO projects, Social Security’s retirement fund will also be out of cash.

So, the exact years are in question, but the timeframes are roughly equivalent.

One concern: the ‘multiplier effect’

And it’s not only the SSDI direct benefits that add to the bill. From the NYT’s piece, which gives a dollar figure of benefits in Puerto Rico as averaging a “modest” $1,064 a month:

But the program opens up access for recipients to other government programs, multiplying the ultimate cost to taxpayers.

Anyone who spends two years on SSDI qualifies for the Medicare health program, which usually is available only for those 65 years old and older. SSDI recipients tend to remain tethered to the program for years, and the government’s lifetime financial commitment averages $300,000 per person, estimates David Autor, an SSDI expert who teaches at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “The system has profound problems,” Mr. Autor said.

SSDI’s financial woes pose a major test for the White House and Congress, which have been reluctant to tackle the budget-busting costs of entitlements.

Analysts who track the program say the only short-term way to save it without raising taxes would be to fold it into the fund that pays Social Security. That would likely force retirees to face benefit cuts two or three years sooner than they otherwise would have done, because SSDI costs would diminish retirement funds.

SS & SSDI fundings have been combined before

Various sources agree that Social Security (retirement) and SSDI (disability payments) were, in fact, temporarily combined in 1994, as a stopgap, emergency measure. What I’ve not understood, yet–although I do get it about the “multipliers–is how can payroll-funded benefits be such a problem?

In other words, if unemployment is the prime factor, i.e. joblessness strains the system via reduced payroll-tax contributions, then why doesn’t the system seem to care more about unemployment?

Weeding out beneficiaries who ‘sneak back to work’

SSI is not funded by payroll deductions but by the general revenue fund. In other words, a work history is not required to qualify. However, it is much more restrictive. According to the AP, a chronic problem–which we’ve reported about–is lack of review that would spot beneficiaries who have gotten work but kept taking benefits:

Today, about 13.6 million people receive disability benefits through Social Security or Supplemental Security Income. Social Security is for people with substantial work histories, and monthly disability payments average $927. Supplemental Security Income does not require a work history but it has strict limits on income and assets. Monthly SSI payments average $500.

As policymakers work to improve the disability system, they are faced with two major issues: Legitimate applicants often have to wait years to get benefits while many others get payments they don’t deserve.

Last year, Social Security detected $1.4 billion in overpayments to disability beneficiaries, mostly to people who got jobs and no longer qualified, according to a recent report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

Delays can leave unpaid bills piled high

Another concern, according this piece at credit.com, is the delay and lag-time in receiving benefits. As mentioned, the influx of applicants from the unemployed adds to the delay. So what shape are beneficiaries in when they finally begin receiving payments?

For many recipients, Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are their financial lifeline. Their more immediate concern may not be what happens in Washington to save the program, but what happens today to the money they receive. I couldn’t find any statistics about how many SSDI and SSI recipients have past-due bills, but if our email is any indication, plenty of them are struggling and getting calls from creditors or debt collectors threatening to take the little income they do get each month. And because it takes so long to get approved for disability these days, applicants may find themselves already in the hole by the time they start receiving benefits.

Benefits not shielded from child support, taxes or student loans

However, there’s a bright spot in that few creditors can successfully come after these benefits. Again from credit.com: “For those who rely on these benefits, the good news is that they are generally protected from creditors and debt collectors. However there are exceptions in the case of past-due child support, past-due taxes, and federal student loans. “ ‘They can chase you (for student loans) to the grave,’ warns bankruptcy attorney Cathy Moran.”

Free evaluation available

Just remember, we can help connect you with a compatible, trained attorney who can help you with your case–if nothing else, it’s possible that an experienced attorney might be able to steer your case toward a more reasonable outcome.

Help is available whether you’re fighting denied or delayed benefits or whether creditors are threatening to attach benefits you’ve already received. Consider signing up for your free evaluation today.

Economy trouble for SSDI: Applications rose almost in tandem with total unemployment from 2008 to 2009

Friday, September 17th, 2010

A 21-per cent jump, from 2008 to 2009, in applications for Social Security Disability Insurance has spooked authorities and pundits around the country.

The lede of a Sept. 14 piece in The Washington Post reads, “The number of former workers seeking Social Security disability benefits has spiked with the nation’s economic problems, heightening concern that the jobless are expanding the program beyond its intended purpose of aiding the disabled.”

Worried officials

The next day, this was posted at PoynterOnline: “In just one year, from 2008 to 2009, Social Security disability applications rose by 21 percent. That is a big problem. While only half of applicants get the benefits they seek, officials are worried that the growth threatens to sink the program. Disability claims are for people who have a ‘substantial work history’ and ‘a medical issue that prevents them from holding a job for at least a year.’ ”

SSDI called ‘hidden welfare’

However, a day before the WP story came out, Slate ran its own take on the SSDI program, a caustic account headlined thus: “America’s Hidden Welfare Program: Social Security’s disability insurance is expensive, destructive, and out of control.”

Describing SSDI recipients as those “millions of Americans without work [who] have quietly continued to cash a federal check every month . . . [and who] don’t show up in the unemployment statistics—not even as ‘discouraged’ workers—and . . . [whose] benefits won’t stop after 99 weeks,” the Slate piece profiles the SSDI progam, beginning with recipients:

They are the recipients of Social Security’s Disability Insurance, a somewhat obscure federal program that nonetheless eats up nearly $200 billion a year. SSDI began in 1956 and was intended to provide benefits for people between 50 and 64 who’d been in the workforce but had developed “any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration.” At the end of the first year, there were 150,000 Americans receiving SSDI benefits. As Congress serially widened the eligibility criteria—by age, by type and duration of impairment—that number began to grow. Enrollment hit 1 million adults in 1966; by the end of 1977 it was 2.8 million; and today it’s more than 8 million ex-workers, plus another million disabled adult offspring and disabled widows and widowers.

A very real fiscal crisis

The Slate piece also says, “With the annual commitments now at about $180 billion, SSDI represents, as the authors of a 2006 economics journal paper put it, a ‘fiscal crisis.’ ” Now, that we can agree on–we’ve written about the mental balancing act required to ignore the politically motivated exaggerations about the threat of the collapsing Social Security general retirement fund while addressing the very real and pressing needs of the SSDI program. However, we couldn’t disagree more with the Slate piece’s next assertion: “Equally distressing, it also represents public policy run amok. Over the last few decades, a program that was designed to help a relatively small group of people who were fatally sick or permanently unable to work has evolved into a backdoor welfare program in which a huge number of people are paid not to get jobs.”

The WP article points out that “Though policymakers anticipated the program’s rolls growing with the aging of the baby-boom population, they suspect the current surge has less to do with any worsening in the health of the workforce than with the poor health of the economy.” The article also says SSA officials are confident in their procedures to ensure screening out unqualified applicants. Given recent concerns raised by a GAO report, we’re not so sure. But it is fairly easy to understand why applications might spike during a financial crisis.

Marginal workers

“But, [SSA officials] acknowledge, when jobs are scarce, more workers who might otherwise struggle through with their ailments try to secure disability benefits,” reports the WP.

“In bad times, the disability rolls are swollen by ‘a lot of older workers who are very much on the margins. Often, they are the first people laid off,’ Social Security Commissioner Michael J. Astrue said. ‘They can’t find any new work and they are desperate. So they have every incentive to try and get in the program.’ ”

That hardly conjures images of the millions of freeloading scum implied by the Slate article. For one thing, as the writer concedes in this sentence, “Granted, no one gets rich off SSDI—the average monthly check is about $1,000,” there’s simply not enough at stake to tempt millions of otherwise able-bodied workers to risk getting busted for a federal crime.

Second, it’s not as though recipients are picking up free money–anyone who (finally) makes it through all the hurdles and hoops is getting a benefit already qualified for by having worked the necessary amount of quarters.

Finding experienced, trained attorneys

The Poynter post sums it up pretty well: “You might consider looking into the cumbersome process that Social Security disability claimants must go through. It is a system that is set up to weed out the non-worthy, but for those who really need the help, the process can be tough. In most communities you will find law firms that specialize in handling disability claims. No doubt, they would be able to guide you toward some of the more interesting cases near you.”